Warning: Attempt to read property "remove_non_replaced" on null in /www/wwwroot/zhongling.mktdrive.com/wp-content/plugins/seo-by-rank-math/includes/replace-variables/class-replacer.php on line 292

Warning: Attempt to read property "remove_non_replaced" on null in /www/wwwroot/zhongling.mktdrive.com/wp-content/plugins/seo-by-rank-math/includes/replace-variables/class-replacer.php on line 292

Warning: Attempt to read property "remove_non_replaced" on null in /www/wwwroot/zhongling.mktdrive.com/wp-content/plugins/seo-by-rank-math/includes/replace-variables/class-replacer.php on line 292
Case of Claim for Non – Standard Vehicle Tires – zhongling.mktdrive.com

Nullam dignissim, ante scelerisque the is euismod fermentum odio sem semper the is erat, a feugiat leo urna eget eros. Duis Aenean a imperdiet risus.

Case of Claim for Non – Standard Vehicle Tires

On April 29, 2017, Ms. Xu spent 247,000 yuan to buy a car at a 4S store in Shanghai. On March 7, 2018, her daughter had a tire blowout while driving. During maintenance, she learned that the tire was not the official standard run – flat tire for that model.

Ms. Xu believed that the 4S store was fraudulent and demanded a refund plus triple compensation. The 4S store said it was a defect in the original factory assembly, not fraud. The court held that the 4S store had no fraudulent intent but had a performance defect, and awarded 50,000 yuan in compensation, rejecting other claims.

en_USEnglish
Products
Contacts
WhatsApp
Email